Sunday, May 22, 2016

2016 Sermon 7-Hebrews 9

2016 Sermon 7-Hebrews 9


As you will recall Hebrews 8 is all about the new covenant, including vivid descriptions of Jesus as the priest of the new age of grace. Hebrews 9 begins with an even more specific description of the earthly tabernacle. Of course this is lovely to read, as mere literature, but in the case of Scriptures which describe physical things, we must never forget the metaphorical value of these images. Remember as well, that the author of Hebrews is always comparing the new covenant to the old covenant; thus we begin with a detailed discussion of the old covenant, with which the Jews in Jerusalem would have been very familiar.

Hebrews 9:1-7:

Worship in the Earthly Tabernacle
“1 Now the first covenant had regulations for worship and also an earthly sanctuary. 
2 A tabernacle was set up. In its first room were the lampstand, the table and the consecrated bread; this was called the Holy Place. 
3 Behind the second curtain was a room called the Most Holy Place, 
4 which had the golden altar of incense and the gold-covered ark of the covenant. This ark contained the gold jar of manna, Aaron's staff that had budded, and the stone tablets of the covenant. 
5 Above the ark were the cherubim of the Glory, overshadowing the atonement cover. But we cannot discuss these things in detail now. 
6 When everything had been arranged like this, the priests entered regularly into the outer room to carry on their ministry. 
7 But only the high priest entered the inner room, and that only once a year, and never without blood, which he offered for himself and for the sins the people had committed in ignorance.” 

For emphasis I would like to read verse seven again, calling attention to two elements: the first being the distinction between inner and outer, a distinction which will gain in significance in the succeeding verses, and also the issue of blood.

“7 But only the high priest entered the inner room, and that only once a year, and never without blood, which he offered for himself and for the sins the people had committed in ignorance.” 

It appears to me that this scripture is saying that the tabernacle of the old era of law ministered to the physical wants of the people, while the new tabernacle ministers to the spiritual wants of the people; first the outer, then the inner. This is of metaphorical interest, because it mimics the way human beings achieve spirituality; first in the flesh, then in the spirit; it can be no other way, because to incarnate in the flesh is to surrender certain spiritual sensitivities to the physical senses. It may be said that this is the primary challenge of human life--that is to say, from the perspective of the physical, to engage the spiritual, thus suffusing the physical with spiritual power and intelligence. We must never forget the humility that the flesh brings with it, that is to say, in a certain sense, the humiliation that the flesh brings with it; by blinding our spiritual eye, the flesh brings us down to a lower consciousness level, so that we may experience something that is denied to spirit consciousness. Whenever I think of my professional failures, or my small paycheck, or my cheap little apartment in Glenallen, I'm also reminded of the song:


'Tis the gift to be simple, 'tis the gift to be free
'Tis the gift to come down where we ought to be,
And when we find ourselves in the place just right,
'Twill be in the valley of love and delight.

When true simplicity is gained,
To bow and to bend we shan't be ashamed,
To turn, turn will be our delight,
Till by turning, turning we come 'round right.


Now the mention of BLOOD brings with it massive waves of resonance, significant to so many of the basic dogmas associated with Christianity. You may remember a few months ago, in a sermon concerning the virgin birth, I made these comments about the blood:

“Now, to begin with, we must remind you that much has been said at the Basin Bible Church, about Royal bloodlines, and the role of blood in determining the tangible character of the impact of the Divine Presence on the material plane. In this context, considering the blood vis a vis the virgin birth, it becomes significant who Jesus' relatives are. 

The whole idea of a bodhisattva is of interest, because history indicates that there have been many, many advanced souls, who were no longer slaves of the wheel of karma, but who nevertheless chose to come back  to this world from a higher plane, (the Tusita), to perform a life of service. Thus, Jesus fits snugly into the classic definition of a category: the category "bodhisattva". 

The differences between Jesus and these other bohdisattvas are numerous and far-reaching, but a PRIMARY difference between Jesus and these other bodhisattvas might be measured by the mere MAGNITUDE of Jesus' message and His accomplishment. Jesus, more than any other saint in history, steered humanity around a corner into a new age. It is inconceivable that, any time soon, there will be another such bodhisattva so invested with the Christ that he takes ownership of the world--I think this real estate is spoken for. Jesus claimed responsibility for Original Sin, demonstrated His claim through dramatic action, and, in one HUGE quantum leap, brought forth, out of His blood, a new world. 

Remember that it was blood untouched by Original Sin; to achieve this level of purity, in the blood of the Christ, was the whole point of the virgin birth, and was the whole point behind Jesus' being of the House of David. Jesus appeared at a synchronous moment in time when vast cosmic energies were poised on the horizon of a new beginning--Jesus set those energies in motion, and brought the deep, dark IDEA into the light of BEING. The chances of such a thing, happening again in the near future, are slight. The good thing about a quantum leap is that: once the electron reaches escape velocity, it NEVER falls back into a lower orbit.” 

These considerations of the mystery of the blood have far-reaching ramifications, as we will see below; indeed there is hardly ever a mention of the authority of Jesus that does not go hand in hand with mention of His blood sacrifice.

For example, from The 5th Chapter of the Gospel of Thomas we read:

“Jesu, that hast accounted us worthy to partake of the eucharist of thine holy body and blood, lo, we are bold to draw near unto thine eucharist and to call upon thine holy name: come thou and communicate unto us.”

Notice the invocation of Jesus to “communicate unto us”. It is such a miracle that we can reach out of our limited carnal selves into the all-consciousness, and connect our puny human consciousness with the Christ consciousness. It makes me feel lazy that I don't do this more, meditate more, and experience the selfless consciousness of the Cloud of Unknowing more often, and more intensely than I do; but I know that one of my great professional downfalls has been greed, so I always guard against taking too much of anything. Certain levels of consciousness have been purposefully denied to me, by my spirit guides, and this must be for a reason. It is related to how I have come to live in this place, where worldly success is withheld, but where, of all places, I, as my highest self, wanted to be. It is also not unrelated to how I have let myself get fat—I may feel guilty when I look at a skinny man, but it's a gift to be simple, it’s a gift to come down where I ought to be. Can it truly be that there is a reason for everything, including our faults?

Rudolf Steiner was crucial to my coming to understand the significance of the blood. His lecture, The Etherisation of the Blood, Basle, October 1, 1911, goes very deeply into the actual mechanics of divine identity being transmitted through the blood:

“Just as in the region of the human heart the blood is continually being transformed into etheric substance, a similar process takes place in the Macrocosm. We understand this when we turn our minds to the Mystery of Golgotha — to the moment when the blood flowed from the wounds of Jesus Christ.

This blood must not be regarded simply as chemical substance, but by reason of all that has been said concerning the nature of Jesus of Nazareth it must be recognised as something altogether unique. When it flowed from His wounds, a substance was imparted to our Earth, which in uniting with it, constituted an Event of the greatest possible significance for all future ages of the Earth's evolution — and it could take place only once. What came of this blood in the ages that followed? Nothing different from what otherwise takes place in the heart of man. In the course of Earth evolution this blood passes through a process of “etherisation.” And just as our human blood streams upwards from the heart as ether, so since the Mystery of Golgotha the etherised blood of Christ Jesus has been present in the ether of the earth. The etheric body of the Earth is permeated by the blood — now transformed — which flowed on Golgotha. This is supremely important. If what has thus come to pass through Christ Jesus had not taken place, man's condition on the Earth could only have been as previously described. But since the Mystery of Golgotha it has always been possibe for the etheric blood of Christ to flow together with the streamings from below upward, from heart to head.

Because the etherised blood of Jesus of Nazareth is present in the etheric body of the Earth, it accompanies the etherised human blood streaming upwards from the heart to the brain, so that not only those streams of which I spoke earlier meet in man, but the human blood-stream unites with the blood-stream of Christ Jesus. A union of these two streams can, however, come about only if a person is able to unfold true understanding of what is contained in the Christ Impulse. Otherwise there can be no union; the two streams then mutually repel each other, thrust each other away. In every epoch of Earth evolution understanding must be acquired in the form suitable for that epoch. At the time when Christ Jesus lived on Earth, preceding events were rightly understood by those who came to His forerunner, John, and were baptised by him according to the rite described in the Gospels. They received baptism in order that their sin, that is to say, the karma of their previous lives — karma which had come to an end — might be changed; and in order that they might realise that the most powerful Impulse in Earth evolution was about to descend into a physical body. But the evolution of humanity progresses and in our present age what matters is that people should recognise the need for the knowledge contained in Spiritual Science and be able so to fire the streams flowing from heart to brain that this knowledge can be understood.”

Of the many nuggets contained in the above quotation, I would like to emphasize the word Karma in the special sense in which we have been using it lately. Steiner seems to attribute to Karma the same impersonal characteristics that were noted by Deepak Chopra last week: 

“Karma, when properly understood, is just the mechanics through which consciousness manifests.” 

Notice that Jesus was able to change Karma; Karma, the idea that: if this happens, then consequently that happens; in the natural world, Karma becomes the law. Jesus came to break the law, to break the chains of Karma, to do away with the necessity of things making sense on a mundane level, to point our spiritual eyes to abstract realms in which non-sensible things make perfect sense.


Continuing with Hebrews 9:8: here is reprised the idea that blood supplies the entryway into the inner room.

8 The Holy Spirit was showing by this that the way into the Most Holy Place had not yet been disclosed as long as the first tabernacle was still standing.” 

Note how the author continues to pump up his audience with the point that the new religion of Jesus is better than the old religion of the Jews. He/She hammers in the idea that the old tabernacle must be destroyed in order for the new tabernacle to emerge. The death of Jesus as the first Adam, culminating in the birth of Jesus as the new Melchizedek, is a metaphor for the transformation all of us must undergo before we can advance spiritually.

In Hebrews 9:9-10, the author exhorts his audience to examine closely the regulation of the external practice of the many rituals which dominate Hassidic life, and seek new rituals in the new order. Another way of saying it would be, "Let us continue the practice of rituals, but let them be suffused with spiritual power; let us use the blood sacrifice of Jesus to connect us spiritually from below to above, and let this connection be accomplished through material pathways. What a miracle.

"9 This is an illustration for the present time, indicating that the gifts and sacrifices being offered were not able to clear the conscience of the worshiper. 
10 They are only a matter of food and drink and various ceremonial washings--external regulations applying until the time of the new order."

In Hebrews 9:11-14 we return to the idea of blood--in this case, you might say the inner blood and the outer blood. The outer blood, the sacrifice that was made in the old tabernacle, was goats’ blood. We have spoken of goats, many times, as the paradigm of the dumb animal. The ultimate humiliation of reincarnation would not be reborn into the body of a cow, but into the body of a goat. Thus the author of Hebrews describes the old life as somehow horribly degraded, while the new life made possible through the etherised blood of Jesus, is totally magnificent.

The author keeps reminding us of an inner and outer consciousness, inwardly clean vs. outwardly clean, God-made vs. man-made. We are reminded that the tabernacle made available to us through the blood of the Christ was not part of mundane creation, but became the entryway into a new way of being human.

The Blood of Christ
11 When Christ came as high priest of the good things that are already here, he went through the greater and more perfect tabernacle that is not man-made, that is to say, not a part of this creation. 
12 He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves; but he entered the Most Holy Place once for all by his own blood, having obtained eternal redemption. 
13 The blood of goats and bulls and the ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who are ceremonially unclean sanctify them so that they are outwardly clean. 
14 How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!” 

Notice the appearance of the expression “once for all”. We have commented on this before, in its use as a way of emphasizing the unique position Jesus holds in history. Also is to be emphasized the idea that Jesus was unblemished. This is an important point for Christians to embrace, because it is one of these miracles that seem so impossible. As materialists we would like to think that Jesus was born as a man and became the Christ; but actually this is backwards: Jesus was born the Christ and became a man. One more miracle.

I also find worthy of comment the idea of the spirit cleansing "our consciences from acts that lead to death". Remember that the author of Hebrews is offering the Jews of Jerusalem not only the promise of heavenly redemption, but an earthly life suffused with spirituality. 

As an old person I often have to ask myself how long is long enough? I have often deplored the idea of living into an old age of decrepitude, and have promised myself a quick death by suicide if that condition ever came to pass. However, if the blood of Jesus has supplied us with a way to experience heaven on earth, why would we ever forego one second that? It seems to me that if we are there, we are there, and we must embrace and cherish the blessings and the crosses fate impersonally flings at our heads. To put it another way, the acts of conscience which do not lead to death, may also lead us to the peaceful death we all would so much like to have.

Hebrews 9:15 again refers to the Christ as the mediator of a new covenant; it also speaks of an eternal inheritance of deliverance from sins committed in the old covenant.

15 For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance--now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant.” 

Hebrews 9:16-21 is one of these charming Jewish episodes which apply logical legal arguments to material for parable or metaphor. It explains the absolute necessity of the shedding of blood to usher in the new covenant. It goes back to Moses and the original shedding of calves' blood, then refers to the shedding of Jesus’ blood as necessary for forgiveness.

16 In the case of a will, it is necessary to prove the death of the one who made it, 
17 because a will is in force only when somebody has died; it never takes effect while the one who made it is living. 
18 This is why even the first covenant was not put into effect without blood. 
19 When Moses had proclaimed every commandment of the law to all the people, he took the blood of calves, together with water, scarlet wool and branches of hyssop, and sprinkled the scroll and all the people. 
20 He said, "This is the blood of the covenant, which God has commanded you to keep."
21 In the same way, he sprinkled with the blood both the tabernacle and everything used in its ceremonies. 
22 In fact, the law requires that nearly everything be cleansed with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.” 

The argument comparing the calf blood to the blood of Jesus, reminds me of the verse in Matthew, where it is suggested that if the Father cares for the birds of the air, how much more will He care for you: 

Matthew 6:25–27:

“Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?
Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?”

I also love this image of Moses sprinkling calves’ blood on the people, because it is so easy to transpose that image of the old covenant into an image of the new covenant were Jesus is sprinkling His own blood on the people. If you like calf blood WAIT TIL YOU FEEL THIS BLOOD OF THE CHRIST!

The idea of heaven on earth, or indeed heaven in art, is reviewed with reference to copies of the heavenly things. 

23 It was necessary, then, for the copies of the heavenly things to be purified with these sacrifices, but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these. 
24 For Christ did not enter a man-made sanctuary that was only a copy of the true one; he entered heaven itself, now to appear for us in God's presence.” 

With the sentence, "Christ did not enter a man-made sanctuary that was only a copy of the true one; he entered heaven itself, now to appear for us in God's presence," we encounter, once again, the miracle of transformation from a lower to a higher consciousness level; the suffusion of articulate verbal symbols with inarticulate eternal resonance.

In last week's sermon on Hebrews 8 we made the following comments:


"Hebrews 8:4-5
“4 If he were on earth, he would not be a priest, for there are already men who offer the gifts prescribed by the law. 
5 They serve at a sanctuary that is a copy and shadow of what is in heaven. This is why Moses was warned when he was about to build the tabernacle: "See to it that you make everything according to the pattern shown you on the mountain.’ ” 

Additionally, of note is the expression, “a sanctuary that is a copy and shadow of what is in heaven”, an image that is practically identical to Paul’s “through a glass darkly” image in 1st Corinthians. On the strength of this one passage one might be persuaded that Hebrews was IN FACT written by Paul; but, then again, a student of Paul would have picked up this idea from him, which he states in different ways, many times in his letters.

Also, note the idea of COPYING as faithfully as possible, (or you might say IMPRESSING) the patterns of the heavenly sanctuary onto its Earthly shadow. Heavenly PATTERNS. This idea presents the problem that all artists face when summoning up “images” of eternity—how does one recreate the forms of eternity in a material medium? William Blake says:

“Eternity is in love with the forms of time.”

The expression: “the pattern shown you on the mountain”, is so tantalizing to an aesthetician, because the idea of “as above so below” must necessarily be a constant preoccupation of the artist. The artist always attempts to recreate, in the materials of mundane expression, the heavenly forms perceived “on the “high mountain”. Previously I have given sermons on divine forms as they manifest in nature and in art, and the idea appears again, here, with the word “pattern”— "See to it that you make everything according to the pattern shown you on the mountain.’ ” We are instructed to seek the divine perfection in mundane things, as if, as above so below, Heaven might echo through the portals of time."


Hebrews 9:25-28 mentions, once again, the idea of “once and for all”, by reminding us that Jesus’ sacrifice was a one-time thing. The significance of this one-time thing is that, with one magnificent dramatic gesture, Jesus claimed our redemption from Original Sin forever.

25 Nor did he enter heaven to offer himself again and again, the way the high priest enters the Most Holy Place every year with blood that is not his own. 
26 Then Christ would have had to suffer many times since the creation of the world. But now he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself. 
27 Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment, 
28 so Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many people; and he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him.”


Note the reference to the high priest entering “the Most Holy Place every year with blood that is not his own”. Once again we are confronted with this image of a priest sprinkling powerless calf blood on the people, when they could be receiving the blood of the Christ.

So, today's discussion of Hebrews 9 has dwelt heavily on a mystery, the mystery of the blood. In philosophy we are always seeking for first causes—we want to know about that moment just BEFORE the Big Bang. In this discussion of blood the true mystery of spirituality is unfolded to us, along with metaphorical descriptions of the old covenants’ elements brought into play in a new way by the sacrifice of Jesus. Let us pray. 

Jesus thank you for your sacrifice, and thanks for choosing your physical body in a very discriminating way. We hope that, contained in our bodies is the seed of Your blood, that connects us with Your higher consciousness and brings us into the Valley of Love and Delight. Amen.



Sunday, May 1, 2016

2016 Sermon 6 - Hebrews 7-8

2016 Sermon 6 - Hebrews 7-8


Hebrews 7 begins with more material about Melchizedek, material that we covered in great detail last week. Here is a summary reprisal of the main points from Hebrews 7:

Hebrews 7:1-3
“1 This Melchizedek was king of Salem and priest of God Most High. He met Abraham returning from the defeat of the kings and blessed him, 
2 and Abraham gave him a tenth of everything. First, his name means "king of righteousness"; then also, "king of Salem" means "king of peace." 
3 Without father or mother, without genealogy, without beginning of days or end of life, like the Son of God he remains a priest forever. . . . .”

Hebrews 7:11-12
“11 If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the law was given to the people), why was there still need for another priest to come--one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron? 
12 For when there is a change of the priesthood, there must also be a change of the law. . . . .”

[Sidebar: This is a very important point because it indicates that what we have been referring to as the Age of Grace is really, semantically speaking, an age of a NEW LAW. Below we read of a BETTER COVENANT—what is a covenant but

“: a formal and serious agreement or promise
  • law : a formal written agreement between two or more people, businesses, countries, etc.”

Notice the word “written” in the preceding definition; anything written implies verbal constraint, and anything verbal necessarily has a referent in the tangible world. Thus the NEW LAW of Jesus, the BETTER COVENANT, straddles the mundane and spiritual worlds, just like Beethoven straddled the Classical and Romantic Periods—the NEW LAW has one foot planted in the abstract and one foot buried in the human need to express experience in static packets of information. The scripture does not say the Law is done away with, it says, “when there is a change of the priesthood, there must also be a change of the law. . . . .”. 

A CHANGE of the law. It is in this wherein lies the superiority of Christianity over other religions: we Christians get to play by different rules from the World; our citizenship, in the Divine Kingdom of Jesus, buys us the right to see the world from the perspective of the Christ Consciousness, rather than the perspective of SCIENCE, (or LAW): a discipline that is still stuck in the quagmire of material definitions. To be sure, there are some enlightened physicists these days who are blurring the distinction between SCIENCE and METAPHYSICS, but clearly SCIENCE will continue to be concerned exclusively with mundane matters—that is until SCIENCE becomes SOMETHING ELSE. Already, in the following sentence, the change of rules is forthrightly affirmed.] 

Hebrews 7:16
“16 one who has become a priest not on the basis of a regulation as to his ancestry but on the basis of the power of an indestructible life. . . . .”

[The rule of ancestral law submits to the rule of eternal life!]

Hebrews 7:18-21
“18 The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless 
19 (for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God. 
20 And it was not without an oath! Others became priests without any oath, 
21 but he became a priest with an oath when God said to him: "The Lord has sworn and will not change his mind: 'You are a priest forever.' " 
22 Because of this oath, Jesus has become the guarantee of a better covenant. . . . .”

[Sidebar: Remember the argument above associating “covenant” with “written” that is to say “verbal”; here, again, we are reminded of the “oath” of God—“oath” which, in a certain sense, translates into: “contract” (a written agreement). The author of Hebrews says, “a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.”— hope for future rewards in exchange for: 

1. virtuous behavior in the face of adversity, 
2. patience in the face of persecution, and 
3. vision of a higher reality that relieves the pain of mundane reality. 

Some substance of our “hope” resides in our trust in the Oath of God in times of tribulation; indeed, hope resides in a positive attitude toward the future, when the underlying “greater good” of our sufferings is hard to see.]

Hebrews 7:24-27
“24 but because Jesus lives forever, he has a permanent priesthood. 
25 Therefore he is able to save completely those who come to God through him, because he always lives to intercede for them. 
26 Such a high priest meets our need--one who is holy, blameless, pure, set apart from sinners, exalted above the heavens. 
27 Unlike the other high priests, he does not need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins once for all when he offered himself.” 

[Sidebar: I question the phrase once for all. “Once and for all” implies an absolute ending, a halt to the processes of evolution, which go on constantly in any dynamic system, any LIVING system. “Once and for all”, being a parameter of time, has a certain resonance which may not necessarily imply eternal cessation of progress, but merely the articulation of some major historical era. Perhaps what we are talking about is the creation of a new paradigm, a paradigm which IRREVERSIBLY changes the direction of the currents of time; “once and for” all we have entered a new era of evolution. Certainly the “once and for all” for this era refers to the sacrifice Jesus made; that is to say, with His ONE sacrifice, a new consciousness was ushered in, and time immemorial may not alter this change. Jesus provided His disciples with a unique steppingstone—a steppingstone to give Man a boost up the ladder toward spiritual consciousness, from which he may never step back.

Hebrews 7:28
28 For the law appoints as high priests men who are weak; but the oath, which came after the law, appointed the Son, who has been made perfect forever.”

I find a slippery argument in the distinction between “the oath, which came after the law” and Grace. Still, do-be-do-be-do, remember that Jesus 

“straddles the mundane and spiritual worlds, just like Beethoven straddled the Classical and Romantic Periods—the NEW LAW has one foot planted in the abstract and one foot buried in the human need to express experience in static packets of information.”

By “static packets of information” I, of course, mean WORDS—words which, when stitched together, create CONCEPTS.

In Steiner’s Philosphy of Freedom, I found this interesting way of explaining what a concept is: he says that when you observe an object there exist three entities: 

the thing-itself, 
the observer, and 
the idealization of the thing in the abstract. 

When you take away the thing-itself, and the subjective observer, what you have left is the CONCEPT. The WORD is such an archetypal Concept, which exists in an idealized world of abstraction.

I've often contemplated the humanity of words. Words are essentially abstract because they represent something in an ideal or an archetypal way; but they also are refer to things in the physical universe, the material universe. Hence, the expression “Word of God Incarnate” is such a power-packed concept because it leads us to contemplate the union of spirit and flesh, synthesized in the divine personality of Jesus.


The foregoing summary, in Chapter Seven, of all the qualities of the the Priest/Messiah paves the way to Chapter Eight wherein the features of the NEW COVENANT the NEW LAW are described.

Chapter 8 of Hebrews is subtitled: The high Priest of the New Covenant. The chapter begins with a a further affirmation of the authority of the priesthood, but then goes on to deeper issues, all beautifully expressed. First, we have this, which graphically places Jesus in Heaven, AND in the familiar setting of the Sanctuary, a sanctuary not of Man, but the TRUE TABERNACLE, the ABSTRACT TABERNACLE. 

Hebrews 8:1-2
“1 The point of what we are saying is this: We do have such a high priest, who sat down at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in heaven, 
2 and who serves in the sanctuary, the true tabernacle set up by the Lord, not by man. 

But after affirming Jesus’ divinity the author goes on to remind of Jesus’s HUMANITY:

Hebrews 8:3
3 Every high priest is appointed to offer both gifts and sacrifices, and so it was necessary for this one also to have something to offer.”

The “something to offer” line refers to Jesus’ humanity—the vital link between Himself as God and Himself as Man. 

The following passage tells me something about the Human/God idea. When I read it, I see in my imagination a phantom, a ghost, (the HOLY GHOST?) ministering to poor helpless humanity from behind  a curtain, like the Wizard of Oz, only more holy and more human. 

Hebrews 8:4-5
“4 If he were on earth, he would not be a priest, for there are already men who offer the gifts prescribed by the law. 
5 They serve at a sanctuary that is a copy and shadow of what is in heaven. This is why Moses was warned when he was about to build the tabernacle: "See to it that you make everything according to the pattern shown you on the mountain.’ ” 

Additionally, of note is the expression, “a sanctuary that is a copy and shadow of what is in heaven”, an image that is practically identical to Paul’s “through a glass darkly” image in 1st Corinthians. On the strength of this one passage one might be persuaded that Hebrews was IN FACT written by Paul; but, then again, a student of Paul would have picked up this idea from him, which he states in different ways, many times in his letters.

Also, note the idea of  COPYING as faithfully as possible, (or you might say IMPRESSING) the patterns of the heavenly sanctuary onto its Earthly shadow. Heavenly PATTERNS. This idea presents the problem that all artists face when summoning up “images” of eternity—how does one recreate the forms of eternity in a material medium? William Blake says:

“Eternity is in love with the forms of time.”

The expression: “the pattern shown you on the mountain”, is so tantalizing to an aesthetician, because the idea of “as above so below” must necessarily be a constant preoccupation of the artist. The artist always attempts to recreate, in the materials of mundane expression, the heavenly forms perceived “on the “high mountain”. Previously I have given sermons on divine forms as they manifest in nature and in art, and the idea appears again, here, with the word “pattern”— "See to it that you make everything according to the pattern shown you on the mountain.’ ” We are instructed to seek the divine perfection in mundane things, as if, as above so below, Heaven might echo through the portals of time.

But my interest, at this point, is not in the ramifications of heavenly patterns as they pertain to sacred art, but merely as an observation that here we have one more context in which the divine and the mundane may be seen to overlap. 

Another interesting question is: does this overlap happen by itself, as Deepak Chopra would say, driven by deeper, impersonal karmic forces; or do we create the proper conditions, for these syntheses of spirit and matter to take place, though act of will, as articulate expressions of existence?

Going on:

Hebrews 8:6-9
“6 But the ministry Jesus has received is as superior to theirs as the covenant of which he is mediator is superior to the old one, and it is founded on better promises. 
7 For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another. 
8 But God found fault with the people and said: "The time is coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah. 
9 It will not be like the covenant I made with their forefathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they did not remain faithful to my covenant, and I turned away from them, declares the Lord.” 

The history lesson, contained in this reference the Jews’ escape from Egypt, is one of the features of Hebrews that makes it such an attractive work—morality, mysticism and history all in one. Always striving for credibility with the traditional Jews in Jerusalem, the author of Hebrews never fails to take advantage of any possible connection to be made with the JEWISHNESS of his/her audience. Not only is the book unusually well written, not only does it express high vibratory spiritual truths which make us stronger and better, it also includes adorable, edifying notes whose purpose is to help put all of this new material into a perspective which the Jews of Jerusalem could better relate to. Including historical precedent to support the author's arguments is a strategy we have seen before in Hebrews, and it is a very Jewish thing to do.


As I contemplate the spiritual evolution of man, as we know it, in its very slight and truncated form, I'm fascinated by the idea that Jesus brought the world a better idea, a better way of living. Always in a practical way, Jesus makes our lives here and now more rewarding, more intrinsic, more integrated, more real. The Age of Rationality, the age of Good and Evil and the Law, must have burdened its inmates with a perspective on life that, to us now by comparison, seems painfully limited. I thank God every day for the universal perspective Christianity has given me, allowing me to see such a big picture. This bigger picture carries implications as to specific behavior: Jesus made the world better by raising men's expectations of what they were able to give to each other, to give to their friends and to tolerate from their enemies. Jesus never says that our enemies will be done away with, he just instructs us to love them; He trusts that the operation of love on evil will have a disinfecting effect.

Remember that the: 

“covenant of which he is mediator is superior to the old one, and it is founded on better promises.”

The expression, “better promises”, focusses us somewhat on the future because it has to do with karma and the reward the righteous living, but it also implies better living in the here and now, since now is the only piece of eternity that we can experience on this consciousness level.

I recently stumbled across the section from Steiner’s Philosophy of Freedom, which bears on the subject of “mediator. Note, below, that Steiner expresses the idea of creating concepts out of words with the word “thinking”:

“Concepts cannot be gained through observation. This follows from the simple fact that the growing human being only slowly and gradually forms the concepts corresponding to the objects which surround him. Concepts are added to observation. 
A philosopher widely read at the present day -- Herbert Spencer, -- describes the mental process which we carry out with respect to observation as follows: 

“If, when walking through the fields some day in September, you hear a rustle a few yards in advance, and on observing the ditch-side where it occurs, see the herbage agitated, you will probably turn towards the spot to learn by what this sound and motion are produced. As you approach there flutters into the ditch a partridge; on seeing which your curiosity is satisfied -- you have what you call an explanation of the appearances. The explanation, mark, amounts to this; that whereas throughout life you have had countless experiences of disturbance among small stationary bodies, accompanying the movement of other bodies among them, and have generalized the relation between such disturbances and such movements, you consider this particular disturbance explained on finding it to present an instance of the like relation.”

A closer analysis shows matters to stand very differently from the way described above. When I hear a noise, I first look for the concept which fits this observation. It is this concept which first leads me beyond the mere noise. If one thinks no further, one simply hears the noise and is content to leave it at  that. But my reflecting makes it clear to me that I have to regard the noise as an effect. Therefore not until I have connected the concept of effect with the perception of the noise, do I feel the need to go beyond the solitary observation and look for the cause. The concept of effect calls up that of cause, and my next step is to look for the object which is being the cause, which I find in the shape of the partridge. But these concepts, cause and effect, I can never gain through mere observation, however many instances the observation may cover. Observation evokes thinking, and it is thinking that first shows me how to link one separate experience to another. 

If one demands of a "strictly objective science" that it should take its content from observation alone, then one must at the same time demand that it should forego all thinking. For thinking, by its very nature, goes beyond what is observed. 

We must now pass from thinking to the being that thinks; for it is through the thinker that thinking is combined with observation. Human consciousness is the stage upon which concept and observation meet and become linked to one another. In saying this we have in fact characterized this (human) consciousness. It is the mediator between thinking and observation. In as far as we observe a thing it appears to us as given; in as far as we think, we appear to ourselves as being active. We regard the thing as object and ourselves as thinking subject. Because we direct our thinking upon our observation, we have consciousness of objects; because we direct it upon ourselves, we have consciousness of ourselves, or self-consciousness. 

Human consciousness must of necessity be at the same time self-consciousness because it is a consciousness which thinks. For when thinking contemplates its own activity, it makes its own essential being, as subject, into a thing, as object.”


What we mean to say here, is that consciousness creates both the material world, and the egoic world. Seen from this Perspective, our mundane sensations may be magnified and transformed into radiant heavenly energies, which resonate with both the lower and the higher consciousness levels simultaneously. Indeed, the new covenant, which includes the promise of a better life, was a change in Perspective for humanity from the rational to the spiritual, the essence of the spiritual being LOVE. The new covenant is a message of love brought to a cold and loveless world. Reaching out of themselves, grasping the connectedness between themselves and others, Man sought this love through acts of will. The Age of Rationality always worked to separate man from man by enabling him to make distinctions, distinctions emphasizing separateness. The Age of Grace has taught us that this separateness, this isolation, is healed by Love—Love made available to us through grace, NOT WILL. Distinctionless, bottomless, unconditional love is the impersonal force that forges a pathway to God.

Going on:

Hebrews 8:10
“10 This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time, declares the Lord. I will put my laws in their minds and write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people.”

“I will put the new laws in their minds and write them on their hearts.” This is an interesting expression. To write the new laws of spirituality on the heart is definitely a new age expression. It also brings the mediator into the spotlight again, because the mediator’s main medium of expression is the heart. The higher spiritual truths are only understood in the language of the heart.

Going on:

Hebrews 8:11-13
“11 No longer will a man teach his neighbor, or a man his brother, saying, 'Know the Lord,' because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest. 
12 For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more." 
13 By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.”

The Eighth Chapter of Hebrews describes and prophesies the New Covenant—everything new, everything different. All of the properties of the New Covenant, so described, reside in the abstract—everything real refers to spiritual reality: The New Covenant, the True Tabernacle, the Change of the Priesthood, the Oath of God, and Patterns of Heavenly Forms. It is such a glorious message of Hope that it sort of helps to put yourself back in the days of Paul and imagine what this message would feel like to those who were hearing it for the very first time. Then we ought to really feel the newness of spiritual experience, as each anomalous now parades us through the halls of time where, at the end of the tunnel, we meet Jesus.

Let us pray: Jesus, thank you for this message of hope and for the newness of life contained in every moment we spend with You. Amen.